Cost of the Death Penalty Essay -- essays research papers

Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the conclusion penalization. Costanzo provides a re candidate of the history of the remnant penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He as well questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He almost examines the publics support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own termination and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society quite an than for it.Costanzo concludes there are four trends throughout the history of the death penalty. First, he believes there has been a dramatic shrinking in the nu mber and types of crimes punishable by death. At one point in early compound times, he argues that there were over fifty crimes fit for death, including vagrancy and petty theft. He believes there is a trend that attempts to lessen the cruelty of executions. Through the tests and reviews of quondam(prenominal) methods of killing, each one gets a little more(prenominal) humane, as the Supreme Court puts it. The third trend mentioned attempts to make the death penalty imposed fairly and rationally. Through the revised process of how it is imposed, to the choice of death in the jurys deliberations, there have been drastic changes in how we chose the use this method of penalisation. Lastly, the fourth trend is the sanitizing of executions (conducted late at nighttime and using well-defined and specialized procedures). Although this may run side by side with the revision of the death penalty process, Costanzo explains that there is a residue between the reasons why we chose the dea th penalty in cases, which is the revision discussed in trend number 3, and the revision of how it is carried out, which is the fourth. The practices have come along steering, save if history proves true, Costanzo argues, there will be a new way of doing it in the not so distant future, which will be called more humane and fit for use in our penal system.Costanzo sites the two drainage basin decisions of the Supreme Court. Furman vs. Georgia (1972) ruled that capital ... ...wn government put raft to death, the more likely they will be to use death in their own world. Also, he believes the evidence shows those who currently support the death penalty would favor other types of alternatives if presumptuousness the option and explanation. Largely he believes wad want justice and choose the death penalty due to a lack of any other sure way to keep the insecure criminals off the street. Costanzo suggests workable alternatives to the death sentence i.e., life without parole rundow n restitution. He believes the public would readily support this if the option was provided and explained. In conclusion, Costanzo believes that the death penalty does not work and should be abolished. He supports his position by thoroughly explaining the history of the death penalty and gives numerous arguments that support that no legal system is able to infallibility and evenhandedly decide who should live and who should die. He points out that those who support it do so in the abstract and that when given a better alternative to ensure the public safety, alternatives that offer punishment without the taking of lives would be preferred over ones that do.